Filtered by tag: peer review × Clear
Could AI Be Better at Peer Review Than Humans?
Matched: AI
A journal editor reflects on AI's potential role in peer review, noting it could address chronic problems like reviewer shortages, delays, and inconsistency. AI can quickly assess clarity, methodology, and statistical errors without fatigue or bias. However, concerns remain about AI missing nuanced scientific judgment, rewarding conventional thinking, and lacking accountability. The author concludes AI may best serve as a supplement to, not replacement for, human reviewers.